Struggling to choose between Altera and Xilinx for your FPGA project? Let’s dissect their key differences.
The EP4CE15E22C8N (Altera Cyclone IV) and XC6SLX9 (Xilinx Spartan-6) differ fundamentally in performance, power, and cost, guiding distinct use cases.
Wondering how their core specs stack up? Dive into the first critical comparison below.
What Are the Core Performance Differences between EP4CE15E22C8N and XC6SLX9?
Confused by conflicting FPGA performance claims? Let’s cut through the noise with hard data.
The EP4CE15E22C8N offers 15K LE (Logic Elements) and 270 MHz max clock, while XC6SLX9 provides 9K LUTs and 400 MHz+ speeds, favoring high-throughput tasks.
Key Performance Breakdown
| Feature | EP4CE15E22C8N (Cyclone IV) | XC6SLX9 (Spartan-6) |
|---|---|---|
| Logic Resources | 15,408 LE | 9,504 LUTs |
| Max Clock Frequency | ~270 MHz | ~400 MHz+ |
| DSP Blocks | 108 | 36 |
| Memory Blocks (Kb) | 480 | 360 |
The XC6SLX9’s higher clock speed and LUT density make it ideal for real-time signal processing, while the EP4CE15E22C8N’s broader LE count suits parallel logic tasks.
Which FPGA Offers Better Power Efficiency for Low-Power Applications?
Tired of excessive power drain in embedded projects? Let’s compare their energy footprints.
The EP4CE15E22C8N shines with 0.1-0.3W typical power (static + dynamic), outperforming XC6SLX9’s 0.2-0.5W in low-power scenarios like IoT sensors.
Power Consumption Deep Dive
- Static Power: EP4CE15E22C8N’s 40nm process reduces leakage current by ~30% vs. XC6SLX9’s 45nm.
- Dynamic Power: At full load, EP4CE15E22C8N draws ~200mA vs. XC6SLX9’s ~350mA.
- Sleep Mode: EP4CE15E22C8N drops to <1mW, while XC6SLX9 idles at ~5mW.
For battery-powered devices or energy-efficient edge systems, the Cyclone IV’s power optimization gives it a clear edge.
In Terms of Cost, Which One Is More Economical for Projects?
Fed up with FPGA budget overruns? Let’s analyze their total cost of ownership.
The EP4CE15E22C8N typically costs $8-$12 in bulk, ~20% cheaper than XC6SLX9’s $10-$15, with lower toolchain and maintenance costs for Altera users.
Cost Structure Comparison
| Expense Category | EP4CE15E22C8N | XC6SLX9 |
|---|---|---|
| Unit Price (1000pcs) | $8.50 | $11.20 |
| Development Tools | Free Quartus Lite | Free Vivado WebPACK |
| Long-Term Support | Until 2030 (Altera) | Until 2027 (Xilinx) |
| Upgradability | Limited (Cyclone IV end-of-life) | Active Spartan-6 ecosystem |
While XC6SLX9 offers newer features, EP4CE15E22C8N’s upfront cost savings and extended support make it preferable for budget-conscious projects.
Conclusion
Choose EP4CE15E22C8N for low-power, cost-sensitive tasks; opt for XC6SLX9 when performance and modern toolchains are non-negotiable.
For reliable sourcing of EP4CE15E22C8N, XC6SLX9, and other FPGAs, trust South-Electronic. We deliver authentic components, technical support, and competitive pricing for projects of all scales. Our fast turnaround and industry expertise ensure seamless integration. Contact us today to optimize your FPGA (selection) with tailored solutions
